﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>San Diego County Personal Injury Lawyer - Defective &amp; Dangerous Products</title>
    <description>Contact San Diego County personal injury attorneys if you're a victim of serious personal injury or wrongful death. Free consultations for those injured due to the negligence of others.</description>
    <link>http://sandiegocounty.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/</link>
    <atom:link href="http://sandiegocounty.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>OfficeMax Task Chairs Recalled</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.officemax.com/"&gt;Office Max&lt;/a&gt;, in cooperation with the CPSC, announced a voluntary recall of more than 216,000 &lt;a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09336.html"&gt;Office Max Task Chairs&lt;/a&gt; because the back and base post can break while in use, posing a fall hazard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;35 reports of the chair backs and/or posts breaking have been reported to the company, including 15 reports of injuries ranging from cuts and bruises to concussions and muscle strains.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Office Max Task Chairs with Model No. OM182 and OM96614 are involved in the recall. The model number is located under the seat of the chair.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chairs were sold nationwide on the company&amp;rsquo;s Web site and through catalogs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chairs should be returned to any OfficeMax Store as soon as possible for a full refund or gift card if the consumer does not have a receipt of purchase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Consumer Information: &lt;/b&gt;Contact OfficeMax at (800) 283-7674 anytime, or visit &lt;a href="http://www.officemax.com/customerservice/customerService.jsp?subCategoryId=100001&amp;amp;categorySelect=Products"&gt;www.officemax.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://sandiegocounty.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/officemax-task-chairs-recalled.aspx?googleid=270180"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.injuryboard.com/Chrissie-Cole/"&gt;Chrissie Cole&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://sandiegocounty.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/officemax-task-chairs-recalled.aspx?googleid=270180</link>
      <source url="http://sandiegocounty.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/">San Diego County Personal Injury Lawyer - Defective &amp; Dangerous Products</source>
      <category>Defective &amp; Dangerous Products</category>
      <dc:creator>Chrissie Cole</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Product Liabilty - No Duty To Warn For Sophisticated Users</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Product Liability: The California Supreme Court recently handed down its opinion in &lt;em&gt;Johnson v. American Standard, Inc.&lt;/em&gt; (S139184) affirming that the "sophisticated user" doctrine is a valid defense in California.&amp;nbsp; Federal court have long held that there is no duty to warn a sophisticated user of a product's potential for harm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Generally, in California a manufacturer has a duty to warn users of its products about the potential risks or harm.&amp;nbsp; In &lt;em&gt;Johnson&lt;/em&gt;, the Defendant argued that it did not need to warn the Plaintiff, a heating and air-conditioning technician&amp;nbsp;of the risks of using R-22, a gas used in air conditioners.&amp;nbsp; The Defendant argued that since Mr. Johnson was a sophisticated user, i.e. he was well-aware, due to his training and experience, of the risks associated with R-22, that they had no duty to provide him with any warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trial court granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment and the Court of Appeal affirmed, holding that the sophisticated user doctrine does apply in California.&amp;nbsp; The Supreme Court&amp;nbsp;affirmed and the "sophisticated user" doctrine is now part of California law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://sandiegocounty.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/product-liabilty---no-duty-to-warn-for-sophisticated-users.aspx?googleid=235162"&gt;Originally posted&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.InjuryBoard.com"&gt;InjuryBoard&lt;/a&gt; by Scott Barber</description>
      <link>http://sandiegocounty.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/product-liabilty---no-duty-to-warn-for-sophisticated-users.aspx?googleid=235162</link>
      <source url="http://sandiegocounty.injuryboard.com/defective-and-dangerous-products/">San Diego County Personal Injury Lawyer - Defective &amp; Dangerous Products</source>
      <category>Defective &amp; Dangerous Products</category>
      <dc:creator>Scott Barber</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>